Prince Harry was phone-hacking victim and Piers Morgan knew about it, London court rules

Prince Harry scored the biggest win yet in his legal war against UK tabloids on Friday when London's High Court ruled he had been a victim of phone-hacking and other unlawful acts by Mirror Group journalists with the knowledge of their editors.

King Charles' younger son, who became the first senior UK royal for 130 years to give evidence in court when he appeared at a trial in June, was awarded 140,600 pounds (about NZ$287,400) after the judge agreed he had been targeted by journalists working for Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN).

The judge's conclusion that the editors of the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People knew about the wrongdoing vindicates Prince Harry's vociferous arguments that senior press figures had known about and covered up wrongdoing.

"Today is a great day for truth as well as accountability," Prince Harry, who was not at court, said in a statement read by his lawyer David Sherborne. 

"My commitment to seeing this case through is based on my belief in our need and collective right to a free and honest press, and one which is properly accountable when necessary."

The prince called for authorities to take action against those identified as having broken the law.

Prince Harry's mission

Since stepping down from royal duties in 2020 and moving to California with his US wife Meghan, the Duke of Sussex has made it his mission to rid the UK press of those he accuses of being "criminals masquerading as journalists", especially senior executives and editors. 

The ruling said among the editors who knew about the "widespread" unlawful behaviour was high-profile broadcaster Piers Morgan, the Daily Mirror editor from 1996 to 2004, who has become a leading critic of Prince Harry and Meghan.

Morgan hit back with a defiant statement of his own, saying Prince Harry's mission was not to reform the press but to destroy the monarchy with Meghan.

"I also want to reiterate, as I've consistently said, for many years now, I've never hacked a phone or told anybody else to hack a phone," he told reporters outside his home. "And nobody has produced any actual evidence to prove that I did."

Prince Harry was one of about 100 claimants - including actors, sports stars, celebrities and people who simply had a connection to high-profile figures - who had sued MGN over claims of phone-hacking and unlawful information-gathering between 1991 and 2011. 

He and three others were chosen as test cases and the trial considered 33 articles of about 140, he alleged were the result of unlawful behaviour over 15 years from 1996.

Judge Timothy Fancourt concluded 15 stories were the result of unlawful acts and Prince Harry's phone "was only hacked to a modest extent".

"However, it did happen on occasions from about the end of 2003 to April 2009," Judge Fancourt said. He awarded the Prince aggravated damages because of the cover-up by senior MGN figures.

'Compelling evidence' 

In his excoriating judgment, Judge Fancourt concluded there had been widespread hacking and unlawful activities at MGN, such as "blagging", or gaining information by deception, from 1996 until 2011, even carrying on while a public inquiry into illicit practices at UK newspapers was taking place.

However, he said the board of the company, owned by Reach, had been kept in the dark by its former chief executive Sly Bailey and the group's legal director.

He said they had concealed the unlawful behaviour not only from the other directors but also parliament, a public inquiry into press standards between 2011 and 2012, shareholders and the public - and the High Court at a previous trial in 2015.

An MGN spokesperson said: "We welcome today's judgment that gives the business the necessary clarity to move forward from events that took place many years ago. 

"Where historical wrongdoing took place, we apologise unreservedly, have taken full responsibility and paid appropriate compensation."

A hearing on remaining issues and legal costs will take place next month.

The MGN case is just one of four Prince Harry is pursuing at the High Court. He has won the right to take to trial a similar phone-hacking case against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday, which he has brought with him high-profile figures including singer Elton John.

Allegations of unlawful behaviour by News Corp's News Group Newspapers, the publisher of the Sun, will also go to trial. 

"I've been told that slaying dragons will get you burned," Prince Harry's statement said. "But in light of today's victory and the importance of doing what is needed for a free and honest press - it's a worthwhile price to pay. The mission continues."

Prince Harry scored the biggest win yet in his legal war against UK tabloids on Friday when London's High Court ruled he had been a victim of phone-hacking and other unlawful acts by Mirror Group journalists with the knowledge of their editors.

King Charles' younger son, who became the first senior UK royal for 130 years to give evidence in court when he appeared at a trial in June, was awarded 140,600 pounds (about NZ$287,400) after the judge agreed he had been targeted by journalists working for Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN).

The judge's conclusion that the editors of the Daily Mirror, Sunday Mirror and Sunday People knew about the wrongdoing vindicates Prince Harry's vociferous arguments that senior press figures had known about and covered up wrongdoing.

"Today is a great day for truth as well as accountability," Prince Harry, who was not at court, said in a statement read by his lawyer David Sherborne. 

"My commitment to seeing this case through is based on my belief in our need and collective right to a free and honest press, and one which is properly accountable when necessary."

The prince called for authorities to take action against those identified as having broken the law.

Prince Harry's mission

Since stepping down from royal duties in 2020 and moving to California with his US wife Meghan, the Duke of Sussex has made it his mission to rid the UK press of those he accuses of being "criminals masquerading as journalists", especially senior executives and editors. 

The ruling said among the editors who knew about the "widespread" unlawful behaviour was high-profile broadcaster Piers Morgan, the Daily Mirror editor from 1996 to 2004, who has become a leading critic of Prince Harry and Meghan.

Morgan hit back with a defiant statement of his own, saying Prince Harry's mission was not to reform the press but to destroy the monarchy with Meghan.

"I also want to reiterate, as I've consistently said, for many years now, I've never hacked a phone or told anybody else to hack a phone," he told reporters outside his home. "And nobody has produced any actual evidence to prove that I did."

Prince Harry was one of about 100 claimants - including actors, sports stars, celebrities and people who simply had a connection to high-profile figures - who had sued MGN over claims of phone-hacking and unlawful information-gathering between 1991 and 2011. 

He and three others were chosen as test cases and the trial considered 33 articles of about 140, he alleged were the result of unlawful behaviour over 15 years from 1996.

Judge Timothy Fancourt concluded 15 stories were the result of unlawful acts and Prince Harry's phone "was only hacked to a modest extent".

"However, it did happen on occasions from about the end of 2003 to April 2009," Judge Fancourt said. He awarded the Prince aggravated damages because of the cover-up by senior MGN figures.

'Compelling evidence' 

In his excoriating judgment, Judge Fancourt concluded there had been widespread hacking and unlawful activities at MGN, such as "blagging", or gaining information by deception, from 1996 until 2011, even carrying on while a public inquiry into illicit practices at UK newspapers was taking place.

However, he said the board of the company, owned by Reach, had been kept in the dark by its former chief executive Sly Bailey and the group's legal director.

He said they had concealed the unlawful behaviour not only from the other directors but also parliament, a public inquiry into press standards between 2011 and 2012, shareholders and the public - and the High Court at a previous trial in 2015.

An MGN spokesperson said: "We welcome today's judgment that gives the business the necessary clarity to move forward from events that took place many years ago. 

"Where historical wrongdoing took place, we apologise unreservedly, have taken full responsibility and paid appropriate compensation."

A hearing on remaining issues and legal costs will take place next month.

The MGN case is just one of four Prince Harry is pursuing at the High Court. He has won the right to take to trial a similar phone-hacking case against Associated Newspapers, the publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday, which he has brought with him high-profile figures including singer Elton John.

Allegations of unlawful behaviour by News Corp's News Group Newspapers, the publisher of the Sun, will also go to trial. 

"I've been told that slaying dragons will get you burned," Prince Harry's statement said. "But in light of today's victory and the importance of doing what is needed for a free and honest press - it's a worthwhile price to pay. The mission continues."

Disclaimer: The copyright of this article belongs to the original author. Reposting this article is solely for the purpose of information dissemination and does not constitute any investment advice. If there is any infringement, please contact us immediately. We will make corrections or deletions as necessary. Thank you.